Proof Obama is a Socialist

In his books, Obama admits attending "socialist conferences" and coming into contact with Marxist literature. But he ridicules the charge of being a "hard-core academic Marxist," which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.

However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his "poetry" and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just "Frank."

The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What's more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.

Does the above statement prove Obama a Socialist/Communist? No it does not, but it does prove that from an early age into adulthood, he had associations with communists and socialists and he sought out their conferences the same way you may seek a church. So while it is not proof that he is one here, it does show he has the leaning of socialism and communism and Obama’s associations are very dangerous. Let’s proceed.

AIM recently disclosed that Obama has well-documented socialist connections, which help explain why he sponsored a "Global Poverty Act" designed to send hundreds of billions of dollars of U.S. foreign aid to the rest of the world, in order to meet U.N. demands. The bill has passed the House and a Senate committee, and awaits full Senate action.
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/

WASHINGTON, February 13, 2008 -- Accuracy in Media editor Cliff Kincaid disclosed today that a hugely expensive bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic Senator Barack Obama, was quickly passed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. Kincaid said that the major media's cover-up of the bill, which makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations, demonstrates the media's desire to see Senator Obama elected to the presidency.In a column posted on the AIM web site, Kincaid noted that Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was trying to rush Obama's "Global Poverty Act" (S. 2433) through his committee without hearings. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends. It was scheduled for a Thursday vote but was moved up a day, to Wednesday, and rushed through by voice vote. Kincaid learned, however, that conservative Senators have now put a "hold" on the legislation, in order to prevent it from being rushed to the floor for a full Senate vote.The House version (H.R. 1302) was suddenly brought up on the House floor last September 25 and was passed by voice vote. House Republicans were caught off-guard, unaware that the pro-U.N. measure committed the U.S. to spending hundreds of billions of dollars. Kincaid's column notes that the official in charge of making nations comply with the U.N. Millennium Goals, which are prominently highlighted in the Obama bill, says a global tax will be necessary to force American taxpayers to provide the money.
http://www.aim.org/press-release/aim-says-media-cover-up-obamas-socialist-oriented-global-tax-bill

Wow! Tax Americans and give it to the UN for distribution! That is not Socialism? Take from the “rich”, the U.S citizenry and give it to the “poor” of the UN’s discretion! That is the VERY meaning of Socialism. So I could stop here and my point is proven. The guy is a Socialist and pretty hard core at that! Let’s look closer.

Joe Biden, the dumbest man in Congress per Mark Levin, was the guy behind this bill and trying to sneak it through the Senate! Why did Obama pick Joe? Joe Biden is one of the WORST choices he could have made. However, we now know that we have one Socialist scratching the back of another! Cronyism is alive and well! Did not Obama promise a NEW kind of politics? He picked his VP to pay him back for helping with his Socialist agenda. Do we see how sick this is? Again, I could stop here and my point is proven, but why should I stop when there is so much more.

"Well, the first thing I'd do as president is, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do."
http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/07/one_year_annive.html
**NOTE** This includes partial birth abortion

What is FOCA? Go here to read the bill: http://www.nrlc.org/FOCA/index.html It opens the door to unfettered abortion rights and includes partial birth abortion. This man stands for partial birth abortion and wants to make sure that every woman has the right to murder right up to and including the time that her baby is being born! Population control is a standard of Communism and Nazism. Obama supports this and said it is the FIRST thing he will do as President! That sets the Socialist agenda right there. Again, this is more proof that he is a Socialist. If this does not scare you for his first act, you should rethink your values as an American.

What else is Obama for?

Voted on Senate floor in favor of guestworker-amnesty bill by voting in favor of cloture motion to end debate and bring bill to a vote in 2007
http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=IL&VIPID=1162

He stands for Amnesty. I know many will attack this by saying that Reagan allowed amnesty in his term and he was not a Socialist. That is all true. However, permitting the breaking of laws is nothing any President should do and yes, even Reagan was wrong for it and he knew it after he compromised his principles to go along with the Democrats. So what does this have to do with Socialism? We tried this once under Reagan and it failed. Now that we know that and his number was only a few million, it is now upwards of 20 million. Why do all the Democrats stand for this? They know it is a new power base for them. Get them in here, treat them to welfare and “free” medicine and indoctrinate them, enslave them and use them for your own selfish means! That is the insidious plan.

"Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn't it?" the plumber asked, complaining that he was being taxed "more and more for fulfilling the American dream."
"It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too," Obama responded. "My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody ... I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/13/obama-plumber-plan-spread-wealth/comments/

The above quote is quite popular and well known by now. Spreading the wealth is another word for Socialism! Obama said point blank that is what he wants to do and that is admitted Socialism. Again, he is a Socialist and he wants to bring it to America. That will pervert our system and constitution and change our way of life. Going from Capitalism to Socialism will fundamentally change America and will destroy the America we all know and some of us love today. Again, my point is proven beyond dispute.

MR. BROKAW: Privilege, right or responsibility? Let's start with that.SEN. OBAMA: Well, I think it should be a right for every American.
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/video-obama-says-health-care-is-right.html

In this famous exchange of the last Presidential debate of 2008, Obama says that healthcare should be a right of every American. Imagine that? I challenge you to go to our Constitution and show where it is a right or is even hinted at that it should be a right. I’ll wait right here while you go and read it? Welcome back! Oh, you never found it you said? That’s because it is not there, it is not a right nor should it be. It is a responsibility of every individual, but the now proven Socialist does not think so. What would happen if every American took full responsibility for themselves? The Democratic party would die an immediate death!

There is a LOT more I could go into and will go into with future posts. However, let’s discuss this one and see how and where you stand on Socialism.